<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346326</link>
    <description>Turnkey plantation receipts were held to qualify as agricultural income only to the extent they arose from cultivation and nursery development on the assessee&#039;s own land. The post-transplantation stage, carried out on the customer&#039;s land, was treated as a separate contractual service because its immediate source was the service arrangement, not land owned or used by the assessee. The Court further held that the post-transplantation receipts did not fall within clause (b)(ii) or clause (b)(iii) of the statutory definition, as there was no proof of an ordinary cultivator&#039;s market-making process and no sale of agricultural produce from the customer&#039;s land. The remaining receipts were taxable business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346326</link>
      <description>Turnkey plantation receipts were held to qualify as agricultural income only to the extent they arose from cultivation and nursery development on the assessee&#039;s own land. The post-transplantation stage, carried out on the customer&#039;s land, was treated as a separate contractual service because its immediate source was the service arrangement, not land owned or used by the assessee. The Court further held that the post-transplantation receipts did not fall within clause (b)(ii) or clause (b)(iii) of the statutory definition, as there was no proof of an ordinary cultivator&#039;s market-making process and no sale of agricultural produce from the customer&#039;s land. The remaining receipts were taxable business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>