<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 383 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346325</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Initiating Officer&#039;s order under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. It highlighted the statutory framework for adjudication, provisional attachment, and appeal mechanisms under the Act. The court underscored the importance of due process, noting that the petitioner could raise concerns during the scheduled hearing before the adjudicating authority and exhaust available remedies before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 383 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346325</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Initiating Officer&#039;s order under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles. It highlighted the statutory framework for adjudication, provisional attachment, and appeal mechanisms under the Act. The court underscored the importance of due process, noting that the petitioner could raise concerns during the scheduled hearing before the adjudicating authority and exhaust available remedies before seeking judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>