<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 365 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the regular business profit but reversed the decision regarding the additional income, applying Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal also remanded the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) to the AO for further verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 365 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the regular business profit but reversed the decision regarding the additional income, applying Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal also remanded the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) to the AO for further verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>