<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 364 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing deductions under Section 57 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and deleting disallowances of financial expenses. Certain business promotion expenses were allowed, while others were disallowed based on the necessity of expenditures being wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal emphasized commercial expediency and the relevance of the purpose of expenditures in determining their deductibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 364 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing deductions under Section 57 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and deleting disallowances of financial expenses. Certain business promotion expenses were allowed, while others were disallowed based on the necessity of expenditures being wholly and exclusively for business purposes. The Tribunal emphasized commercial expediency and the relevance of the purpose of expenditures in determining their deductibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>