https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346298 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat Credit by the adjudicating authority, resulting in a tax demand of Rs. 2,40,33,581 against the appellant. The appellant's claim for credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 was rejected. Despite citing precedents and requesting an early hearing due to potential hardship, the Revenue opposed it, citing the burden of pending appeals. The judgment stressed the importance of expeditious justice delivery and suggested developing a policy for early hearings to ensure timely disposal of cases, with guidelines outlined for considering such requests. The matter was referred to the Hon'ble President for potential policy development on early hearing applications. en-us Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:48:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346298 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat Credit by the adjudicating authority, resulting in a tax demand of Rs. 2,40,33,581 against the appellant. The appellant's claim for credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 was rejected. Despite citing precedents and requesting an early hearing due to potential hardship, the Revenue opposed it, citing the burden of pending appeals. The judgment stressed the importance of expeditious justice delivery and suggested developing a policy for early hearings to ensure timely disposal of cases, with guidelines outlined for considering such requests. The matter was referred to the Hon'ble President for potential policy development on early hearing applications. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346298