<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346297</link>
    <description>Notional interest on buyer advances is includible in assessable value only where the advances influence the selling price; on the facts stated, the pricing policy was unchanged and the assessee already paid interest on the advances, so no addition was justified. Where discounts shown in invoices were not actually passed on, and duty on amounts covered by debit notes had already been discharged, no further duty demand survived. The verified report supported the assessee&#039;s position, and the demands and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 355 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346297</link>
      <description>Notional interest on buyer advances is includible in assessable value only where the advances influence the selling price; on the facts stated, the pricing policy was unchanged and the assessee already paid interest on the advances, so no addition was justified. Where discounts shown in invoices were not actually passed on, and duty on amounts covered by debit notes had already been discharged, no further duty demand survived. The verified report supported the assessee&#039;s position, and the demands and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>