<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the duty paid on goods not cleared for home consumption was eligible for a refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, emphasizing that the rejection under the Third Proviso to Section 26A was not in accordance with the statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1339 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the duty paid on goods not cleared for home consumption was eligible for a refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, emphasizing that the rejection under the Third Proviso to Section 26A was not in accordance with the statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>