<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9469</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the validity of the assessment order, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of recording reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. However, the court sided with the Revenue on the applicability of the amendments to sections 139(8), 215, and 217 to assessments of earlier years and the classification of the assessment as a regular assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court did not award any costs in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 24 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9469</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the validity of the assessment order, emphasizing the mandatory requirement of recording reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. However, the court sided with the Revenue on the applicability of the amendments to sections 139(8), 215, and 217 to assessments of earlier years and the classification of the assessment as a regular assessment under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court did not award any costs in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>