<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193580</link>
    <description>A domestic disciplinary finding is vulnerable to judicial review where it rests on no evidence, inadmissible material, or a procedure that denies a reasonable opportunity of defence. The Court stated that it does not sit as an appellate authority in service matters, but may interfere when findings are perverse or unsupported by material a prudent person could accept. It further noted that prior statements under Rule 16(3) of the Delhi Police (F&amp;A) Rules, 1980 can be used only when the witness cannot be produced without undue delay, inconvenience, or expense, and fair-hearing safeguards are observed. On the material accepted in law, the charge was unsustainable and reinstatement with consequential benefits followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 12:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193580</link>
      <description>A domestic disciplinary finding is vulnerable to judicial review where it rests on no evidence, inadmissible material, or a procedure that denies a reasonable opportunity of defence. The Court stated that it does not sit as an appellate authority in service matters, but may interfere when findings are perverse or unsupported by material a prudent person could accept. It further noted that prior statements under Rule 16(3) of the Delhi Police (F&amp;A) Rules, 1980 can be used only when the witness cannot be produced without undue delay, inconvenience, or expense, and fair-hearing safeguards are observed. On the material accepted in law, the charge was unsustainable and reinstatement with consequential benefits followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>