<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346268</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the adoption of a 3% net profit rate on the gross receipts excluding service tax for the assessment year 2009-10. This decision was made considering the failure of the assessee to produce books of accounts, emphasizing the unique circumstances of the case. The ITAT clarified that this rate was specific to the year in question and should not be applied as a precedent for future years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 326 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346268</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the adoption of a 3% net profit rate on the gross receipts excluding service tax for the assessment year 2009-10. This decision was made considering the failure of the assessee to produce books of accounts, emphasizing the unique circumstances of the case. The ITAT clarified that this rate was specific to the year in question and should not be applied as a precedent for future years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>