<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 318 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346260</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) erred in canceling the assessment order under section 263. It found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate enquiries, and the order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 07:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 318 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346260</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (PCIT) erred in canceling the assessment order under section 263. It found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate enquiries, and the order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, quashing the PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>