<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest earned on fixed deposits, provided as bank guarantees under the EPCG scheme for importing capital goods, had a direct nexus with business operations. It was considered a capital receipt and should be set off against project costs, not treated as income from other sources. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest earned on fixed deposits, provided as bank guarantees under the EPCG scheme for importing capital goods, had a direct nexus with business operations. It was considered a capital receipt and should be set off against project costs, not treated as income from other sources. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>