https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346247 The Tribunal upheld the impugned orders, dismissing the appeals as devoid of merit. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit for rejected rubber parts was denied due to the lack of evidence supporting reprocessing into new parts cleared on duty payment. The decision was based on the appellant's failure to provide required documentary proof under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Aug 2017 07:36:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346247 The Tribunal upheld the impugned orders, dismissing the appeals as devoid of merit. The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit for rejected rubber parts was denied due to the lack of evidence supporting reprocessing into new parts cleared on duty payment. The decision was based on the appellant's failure to provide required documentary proof under Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346247