<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 on the appellant for aiding and abetting the evasion of customs duty. Despite claiming innocence and attributing responsibility to others, the appellant was found to have actively participated in the illegal removal of goods and received monetary consideration for facilitating the evasion. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was affirmed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s accountability and the repercussions of involvement in duty evasion under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 302 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377; 50,000 on the appellant for aiding and abetting the evasion of customs duty. Despite claiming innocence and attributing responsibility to others, the appellant was found to have actively participated in the illegal removal of goods and received monetary consideration for facilitating the evasion. The Commissioner&#039;s decision was affirmed, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s accountability and the repercussions of involvement in duty evasion under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>