https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346242 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of silver weighing less than 2 kgs. without foreign markings, rejecting the appellant's arguments based on relevant case laws. It confirmed the correct procedure was followed for seizing the goods and deemed the appellant's retraction of his initial statement as unjustified. Allegations of coercion in obtaining the statement were unsupported, leading to the justification of the confiscation and penalties imposed. The Tribunal found the cited case laws inapplicable and dismissed the appeal due to lack of substantiated arguments and failure to clarify the purpose of carrying the imported silver. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2019 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346242 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of silver weighing less than 2 kgs. without foreign markings, rejecting the appellant's arguments based on relevant case laws. It confirmed the correct procedure was followed for seizing the goods and deemed the appellant's retraction of his initial statement as unjustified. Allegations of coercion in obtaining the statement were unsupported, leading to the justification of the confiscation and penalties imposed. The Tribunal found the cited case laws inapplicable and dismissed the appeal due to lack of substantiated arguments and failure to clarify the purpose of carrying the imported silver. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346242