<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arm&#039;s Length Price: Avoid Separate Methods for Inter-Related Transactions When Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method Fails for One.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35844</link>
    <description>When the transactions are multiple and inter-related then if a particular transaction out of the composite transactions cannot be tested under CUP then it is not proper to apply separate methods for determining the ALP for each of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:25:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arm&#039;s Length Price: Avoid Separate Methods for Inter-Related Transactions When Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method Fails for One.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35844</link>
      <description>When the transactions are multiple and inter-related then if a particular transaction out of the composite transactions cannot be tested under CUP then it is not proper to apply separate methods for determining the ALP for each of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 18:25:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>