<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 286 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346228</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to a delay of 1050 days. The Court found that the reasons provided by the appellant, including personal circumstances such as a matrimonial dispute and financial losses, did not sufficiently justify the delay. Emphasizing the need to establish &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the Court ruled that the appellant failed to meet this standard. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of demonstrating valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 286 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346228</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appellant&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to a delay of 1050 days. The Court found that the reasons provided by the appellant, including personal circumstances such as a matrimonial dispute and financial losses, did not sufficiently justify the delay. Emphasizing the need to establish &quot;sufficient cause&quot; for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the Court ruled that the appellant failed to meet this standard. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, highlighting the importance of demonstrating valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>