<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to the Gross Profit rate and renovation expenses. However, the addition related to unsecured loans was reinstated due to discrepancies and lack of verification. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:23:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 270 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to the Gross Profit rate and renovation expenses. However, the addition related to unsecured loans was reinstated due to discrepancies and lack of verification. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>