https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346210 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal against the order denying the refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal held that the services in question, previously recognized as Input Services in Tribunal judgments, had a nexus with the Output Services exported by the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision and granted the appeal, emphasizing the importance of recognizing services as Input Services based on established precedents and rejecting the denial of Cenvat Credit for the accumulated credit on exported services. en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:22:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346210 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal against the order denying the refund of accumulated Cenvat Credit under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal held that the services in question, previously recognized as Input Services in Tribunal judgments, had a nexus with the Output Services exported by the appellant. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's decision and granted the appeal, emphasizing the importance of recognizing services as Input Services based on established precedents and rejecting the denial of Cenvat Credit for the accumulated credit on exported services. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346210