<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9453</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the retention and authorization orders and directing the return of the seized amount of Rs. 30 lakhs to the petitioner. It held that the petitioner adequately explained the money&#039;s source, and the conditions for invoking Section 132A were not met. The petition was granted with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 37 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9453</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the retention and authorization orders and directing the return of the seized amount of Rs. 30 lakhs to the petitioner. It held that the petitioner adequately explained the money&#039;s source, and the conditions for invoking Section 132A were not met. The petition was granted with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>