https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346198 The Tribunal concluded that the first docket order was withdrawn due to lack of support by reasons. The jurisdiction objection was dismissed, and the case was reheard on merits. The appellant's active role in facilitating a fraudulent sale led to a penalty reduced from Rs. 8 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346198 The Tribunal concluded that the first docket order was withdrawn due to lack of support by reasons. The jurisdiction objection was dismissed, and the case was reheard on merits. The appellant's active role in facilitating a fraudulent sale led to a penalty reduced from Rs. 8 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346198