https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346196 The court upheld the Tax Board's decision against the Revenue in a case where the assessment was reopened by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on information from the Income Tax Department without sufficient additional material. It highlighted the importance of gathering supporting material for assessments. The court emphasized the need for better coordination and information exchange among various tax departments to combat tax evasion effectively. Directives included acting on suggestions, timely sharing of incriminating material, utilizing prosecution power judiciously, and ensuring statewide implementation of the Regional Economic Intelligence Council's mandate to enhance tax enforcement processes. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346196 The court upheld the Tax Board's decision against the Revenue in a case where the assessment was reopened by the Assessing Officer (AO) based on information from the Income Tax Department without sufficient additional material. It highlighted the importance of gathering supporting material for assessments. The court emphasized the need for better coordination and information exchange among various tax departments to combat tax evasion effectively. Directives included acting on suggestions, timely sharing of incriminating material, utilizing prosecution power judiciously, and ensuring statewide implementation of the Regional Economic Intelligence Council's mandate to enhance tax enforcement processes. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346196