<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346194</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition, granting the respondent time to pay the due amount with interest. Failure to comply would result in the publication of citation and appointment of a provisional liquidator. The decision was based on the lack of substantial defense by the respondent and the frivolous nature of the disputed debt claim, emphasizing that contrived disputes cannot be used to evade genuine claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346194</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition, granting the respondent time to pay the due amount with interest. Failure to comply would result in the publication of citation and appointment of a provisional liquidator. The decision was based on the lack of substantial defense by the respondent and the frivolous nature of the disputed debt claim, emphasizing that contrived disputes cannot be used to evade genuine claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>