https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193567 The petitioner sought injunctions to prevent removal as director and to continue duties related to Unit 'C' of a company. The court found the petitioner's actions, including starting a consultancy service without approval and not assigning patents, breached fiduciary duty. The Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) removal decision was deemed valid. As the petitioner was no longer a director, relief to carry out Unit 'C' duties was denied. The petition was dismissed for failing to establish oppression or mismanagement, emphasizing shareholders' supremacy in EGM decisions. en-us Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193567 The petitioner sought injunctions to prevent removal as director and to continue duties related to Unit 'C' of a company. The court found the petitioner's actions, including starting a consultancy service without approval and not assigning patents, breached fiduciary duty. The Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) removal decision was deemed valid. As the petitioner was no longer a director, relief to carry out Unit 'C' duties was denied. The petition was dismissed for failing to establish oppression or mismanagement, emphasizing shareholders' supremacy in EGM decisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193567