<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 36 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9448</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal, holding the assessee entitled to exemption under section 54E for capital gains on a depreciable asset despite section 50 deeming the gain as short-term for computation. The court ruled the fiction in section 50 is confined to computation under sections 48/49 and does not negate entitlement to exemption under section 54E, nor does it convert the asset into a short-term asset. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 36 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9448</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal, holding the assessee entitled to exemption under section 54E for capital gains on a depreciable asset despite section 50 deeming the gain as short-term for computation. The court ruled the fiction in section 50 is confined to computation under sections 48/49 and does not negate entitlement to exemption under section 54E, nor does it convert the asset into a short-term asset. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>