https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193564 The civil court had jurisdiction to try the suit, allowing the tenant to install machinery for running a mill on the premises leased for commercial purposes. The courts found no potential damage from the mill operation and dismissed the plaintiffs' injunction request. The lower courts' decisions were upheld in the second appeal, emphasizing that the premises were leased for commercial purposes without a specific use restriction. The owners lacked a cause of action under the Transfer of Property Act, leading to the denial of the injunction. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:42:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193564 The civil court had jurisdiction to try the suit, allowing the tenant to install machinery for running a mill on the premises leased for commercial purposes. The courts found no potential damage from the mill operation and dismissed the plaintiffs' injunction request. The lower courts' decisions were upheld in the second appeal, emphasizing that the premises were leased for commercial purposes without a specific use restriction. The owners lacked a cause of action under the Transfer of Property Act, leading to the denial of the injunction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Nov 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193564