<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1067 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193563</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the grant of interest on unpaid interest was justified based on legal precedents. The ITAT concluded that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to rectify the order, allowing the appeal of the assessee against the withdrawal of interest on unpaid interest already granted. The decision emphasized the significance of legal precedents and the accurate application of tax laws in determining entitlement to interest on unpaid interest under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 14:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1067 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193563</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the grant of interest on unpaid interest was justified based on legal precedents. The ITAT concluded that the Assessing Officer had no jurisdiction to rectify the order, allowing the appeal of the assessee against the withdrawal of interest on unpaid interest already granted. The decision emphasized the significance of legal precedents and the accurate application of tax laws in determining entitlement to interest on unpaid interest under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>