<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 239 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346181</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the legal expenditure incurred by the assessee to defend writ petitions was deemed revenue expenditure as it aimed to protect business interests and did not create a new asset. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the expenditure is deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 239 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346181</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the legal expenditure incurred by the assessee to defend writ petitions was deemed revenue expenditure as it aimed to protect business interests and did not create a new asset. The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming that the expenditure is deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>