<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 224 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, finding the AO had not independently applied his mind, leading to vague reasons for reopening without tangible material. Consequently, the notice under Section 148 and the subsequent assessment order were deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed all five appeals of the assesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 224 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under Section 147, finding the AO had not independently applied his mind, leading to vague reasons for reopening without tangible material. Consequently, the notice under Section 148 and the subsequent assessment order were deemed invalid. The Tribunal allowed all five appeals of the assesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>