<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346163</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the taxability of margins earned on the resale of recharge vouchers and electronic coupons. The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on the margins was unsustainable, as the appellants were not providing business auxiliary services and the principal company had already paid service tax on the entire MRP. Additionally, the Tribunal found that demands based on credit notes issued by the principal company and the taxability of margins on the sale of other products were also unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 221 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346163</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the taxability of margins earned on the resale of recharge vouchers and electronic coupons. The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on the margins was unsustainable, as the appellants were not providing business auxiliary services and the principal company had already paid service tax on the entire MRP. Additionally, the Tribunal found that demands based on credit notes issued by the principal company and the taxability of margins on the sale of other products were also unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>