https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346159 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the appellants engaged in clandestine clearance and undervaluation of plastic bags to benefit from the SSI exemption. The department's valuation method was deemed correct, and the extended period for issuing show cause notices was justified due to the appellants' evasion of duty. Affidavits presented were rejected as unreliable, with the department's evidence from recovered documents and testimonies proving suppression of production and discrepancies in clearances. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:31:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346159 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, concluding that the appellants engaged in clandestine clearance and undervaluation of plastic bags to benefit from the SSI exemption. The department's valuation method was deemed correct, and the extended period for issuing show cause notices was justified due to the appellants' evasion of duty. Affidavits presented were rejected as unreliable, with the department's evidence from recovered documents and testimonies proving suppression of production and discrepancies in clearances. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346159