<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 198 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346140</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioners. The court held that the petitioners&#039; argument for quashing proceedings based on not being signatories to the cheques could not be entertained at that stage, as the trial court needed to assess the documents&#039; admissibility and reliability. The trial court was directed to proceed without influence from the observations made by the court and complete the trial within six months. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to challenge the documents&#039; admissibility and reliability during the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 198 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346140</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act against the petitioners. The court held that the petitioners&#039; argument for quashing proceedings based on not being signatories to the cheques could not be entertained at that stage, as the trial court needed to assess the documents&#039; admissibility and reliability. The trial court was directed to proceed without influence from the observations made by the court and complete the trial within six months. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to challenge the documents&#039; admissibility and reliability during the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>