https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551 Section 11A permits a Labour Court to interfere with dismissal where prolonged, unexplained disciplinary proceedings, the workman's age, and lesser penalties imposed on similarly situated workmen make the punishment highly disproportionate. Reinstatement was sustainable because the Labour Court exercised its discretion on relevant circumstances. Supervisory review under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or breach of natural justice; a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its view for a reasoned Labour Court award. The reinstatement award was restored and the dismissal did not survive judicial scrutiny. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:29:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551 Section 11A permits a Labour Court to interfere with dismissal where prolonged, unexplained disciplinary proceedings, the workman's age, and lesser penalties imposed on similarly situated workmen make the punishment highly disproportionate. Reinstatement was sustainable because the Labour Court exercised its discretion on relevant circumstances. Supervisory review under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or breach of natural justice; a High Court cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute its view for a reasoned Labour Court award. The reinstatement award was restored and the dismissal did not survive judicial scrutiny. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551