<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1340 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Labour Court&#039;s award. The Labour Court&#039;s decision to reinstate the appellant, considering the delay and discriminatory treatment, was upheld. The Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of High Court interference in such matters, ensuring that social welfare legislations are interpreted in line with constitutional goals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1340 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and restoring the Labour Court&#039;s award. The Labour Court&#039;s decision to reinstate the appellant, considering the delay and discriminatory treatment, was upheld. The Supreme Court emphasized the limited scope of High Court interference in such matters, ensuring that social welfare legislations are interpreted in line with constitutional goals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>