https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551 Prolonged disciplinary proceedings, unexplained delay of nearly twelve years, the workman's advanced age at the time of dismissal, and more lenient punishment imposed on similarly situated employees supported Labour Court interference under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act on proportionality grounds. The surrounding circumstances made the dismissal highly disproportionate, so reinstatement was treated as sustainable. The note also states that supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or violation of natural justice, and cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or substitute a different view where the Labour Court has exercised discretion judicially. en-us Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:29:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551 Prolonged disciplinary proceedings, unexplained delay of nearly twelve years, the workman's advanced age at the time of dismissal, and more lenient punishment imposed on similarly situated employees supported Labour Court interference under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act on proportionality grounds. The surrounding circumstances made the dismissal highly disproportionate, so reinstatement was treated as sustainable. The note also states that supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to patent perversity, gross failure of justice, or violation of natural justice, and cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or substitute a different view where the Labour Court has exercised discretion judicially. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193551