<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193552</link>
    <description>Certificates issued under the statutory disability scheme are not immune from verification where the record shows material suggesting fraudulent procurement and misuse of reservation benefits. The SC stated that fraud vitiates all acts, so the State may reopen and verify disability certificates even after issuance by the Medical Board. It also noted that physical inspection alone is not a reliable substitute for medical examination in cases involving visual or hearing impairment. On those facts, the State&#039;s verification exercise was upheld and the restraint imposed by the High Court was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 07:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193552</link>
      <description>Certificates issued under the statutory disability scheme are not immune from verification where the record shows material suggesting fraudulent procurement and misuse of reservation benefits. The SC stated that fraud vitiates all acts, so the State may reopen and verify disability certificates even after issuance by the Medical Board. It also noted that physical inspection alone is not a reliable substitute for medical examination in cases involving visual or hearing impairment. On those facts, the State&#039;s verification exercise was upheld and the restraint imposed by the High Court was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>