<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1223 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions as the petitioners did not qualify as either &quot;Financial Creditors&quot; or &quot;Operational Creditors&quot; under the IBC. The Tribunal refrained from imposing costs on the petitioner and clarified that the observations made should not prejudice the petitioner&#039;s rights before any other forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1223 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions as the petitioners did not qualify as either &quot;Financial Creditors&quot; or &quot;Operational Creditors&quot; under the IBC. The Tribunal refrained from imposing costs on the petitioner and clarified that the observations made should not prejudice the petitioner&#039;s rights before any other forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>