<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 50 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9432</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. It found that the commutation charges were not considered a business loss under sections 28 and 37 of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the alternative claims for deduction under section 57(iii) and for capital loss under section 45 were rejected as the transactions were deemed to be on capital account, not qualifying for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 50 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9432</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. It found that the commutation charges were not considered a business loss under sections 28 and 37 of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the alternative claims for deduction under section 57(iii) and for capital loss under section 45 were rejected as the transactions were deemed to be on capital account, not qualifying for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>