<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9427</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the deduction under section 80TT of the Income-tax Act should be calculated on the net income after deducting expenses, aligning with Supreme Court precedent. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant the deduction on the net amount of Rs. 10,80,000, rather than the gross amount of Rs. 12,00,000. This clarified the interpretation of section 80TT and emphasized computation based on net income, ultimately ruling against the assessee in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 24 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9427</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the deduction under section 80TT of the Income-tax Act should be calculated on the net income after deducting expenses, aligning with Supreme Court precedent. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant the deduction on the net amount of Rs. 10,80,000, rather than the gross amount of Rs. 12,00,000. This clarified the interpretation of section 80TT and emphasized computation based on net income, ultimately ruling against the assessee in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>