https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539 Under section 476B read with section 195(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, an appeal lay to the Supreme Court because the statutory fiction treats a Division Bench of a High Court as subordinate to the court to which appealable decrees or sentences from that Bench would ordinarily go. On the facts, the High Court's discretion to direct a perjury complaint was properly exercised, so the complaint proceedings were upheld. Where civil suits and criminal prosecution were proceeding in parallel, the criminal case was held to deserve precedence to avoid embarrassment to the accused, and the civil suits were stayed until the criminal prosecution concluded. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539 Under section 476B read with section 195(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, an appeal lay to the Supreme Court because the statutory fiction treats a Division Bench of a High Court as subordinate to the court to which appealable decrees or sentences from that Bench would ordinarily go. On the facts, the High Court's discretion to direct a perjury complaint was properly exercised, so the complaint proceedings were upheld. Where civil suits and criminal prosecution were proceeding in parallel, the criminal case was held to deserve precedence to avoid embarrassment to the accused, and the civil suits were stayed until the criminal prosecution concluded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539