https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539 The Supreme Court clarified that an appeal lies to the court subordinate to the one issuing the order directing the filing of a complaint for perjury under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code. It determined that a Division Bench of a High Court is considered subordinate to the Supreme Court for appealable decrees and sentences. The interpretation of "subordinate court" under section 195(3) was crucial, emphasizing that a Division Bench of a High Court is deemed subordinate to the Supreme Court. The Court held that criminal prosecutions should take precedence over civil suits for damages arising from the same facts to ensure swift and fair criminal justice. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 15:53:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539 The Supreme Court clarified that an appeal lies to the court subordinate to the one issuing the order directing the filing of a complaint for perjury under section 476B of the Criminal Procedure Code. It determined that a Division Bench of a High Court is considered subordinate to the Supreme Court for appealable decrees and sentences. The interpretation of "subordinate court" under section 195(3) was crucial, emphasizing that a Division Bench of a High Court is deemed subordinate to the Supreme Court. The Court held that criminal prosecutions should take precedence over civil suits for damages arising from the same facts to ensure swift and fair criminal justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Mar 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193539