<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 48 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that wealth tax could not be levied on any portion of the compensation exceeding her 1/9th share. The decision was based on the finding that the compensation money exceeding the 1/9th share was not received by the assessee and did not belong to her on the valuation date. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the right to compensation was extinguished upon actual receipt of the compensation, and ownership of assets on the valuation date determined the assessment of wealth tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 48 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that wealth tax could not be levied on any portion of the compensation exceeding her 1/9th share. The decision was based on the finding that the compensation money exceeding the 1/9th share was not received by the assessee and did not belong to her on the valuation date. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the right to compensation was extinguished upon actual receipt of the compensation, and ownership of assets on the valuation date determined the assessment of wealth tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>