<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346130</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals related to assessments for various years, deletion of additions in closing stock under Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, and claims for delayed payments of PF and ESIC. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions, citing no substantial questions of law and relying on audit reports and expert opinions supporting the Assessee&#039;s positions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 188 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346130</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals related to assessments for various years, deletion of additions in closing stock under Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, and claims for delayed payments of PF and ESIC. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions, citing no substantial questions of law and relying on audit reports and expert opinions supporting the Assessee&#039;s positions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>