https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346124 The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to pass a speaking order on objections raised by the petitioner post receiving reasons for intended assessment reopening was a violation. The Court emphasized the necessity for a speaking order as per legal requirements. Finding the absence of reasons for rejecting objections and inadequate addressing of objections in the notice, the Court dismissed the argument of alternative remedy and quashed the assessment order. The Court directed the respondents to pass a speaking order on the objections filed by the petitioners in compliance with the law. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:07:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346124 The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to pass a speaking order on objections raised by the petitioner post receiving reasons for intended assessment reopening was a violation. The Court emphasized the necessity for a speaking order as per legal requirements. Finding the absence of reasons for rejecting objections and inadequate addressing of objections in the notice, the Court dismissed the argument of alternative remedy and quashed the assessment order. The Court directed the respondents to pass a speaking order on the objections filed by the petitioners in compliance with the law. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346124