<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 168 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest income earned on bank deposits made from share capital during the construction period should reduce the capital cost of the project, not be taxable income. The Tribunal also upheld the selection of the case for scrutiny assessment under CASS. The decision on March 17, 2017, favored the assessee on both issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 168 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that interest income earned on bank deposits made from share capital during the construction period should reduce the capital cost of the project, not be taxable income. The Tribunal also upheld the selection of the case for scrutiny assessment under CASS. The decision on March 17, 2017, favored the assessee on both issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>