<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346105</link>
    <description>The High Court ordered the appellant to deposit the amount within six weeks to restore the appeal to its original position after finding the appellant&#039;s willingness to comply. Failure to deposit led to the dismissal of the appeal by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Court emphasized the deposit as a condition precedent for setting aside the dismissal, with no costs imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 20:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346105</link>
      <description>The High Court ordered the appellant to deposit the amount within six weeks to restore the appeal to its original position after finding the appellant&#039;s willingness to comply. Failure to deposit led to the dismissal of the appeal by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The Court emphasized the deposit as a condition precedent for setting aside the dismissal, with no costs imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>