<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 159 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346101</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the CENVAT credit on TMT Bars and Cements used for constructing storage tanks, citing the user test principle and legal precedents. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation issue, as the demand for recovery was considered barred by limitation due to a previous objection raised during an audit without a subsequent demand notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 159 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346101</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the CENVAT credit on TMT Bars and Cements used for constructing storage tanks, citing the user test principle and legal precedents. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant on the limitation issue, as the demand for recovery was considered barred by limitation due to a previous objection raised during an audit without a subsequent demand notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>