<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demands, rejecting the appeals filed by the appellant. The judgment clarified that even though the moulds were sold as scrap after being worn out, they were still liable for excise duty due to their nature as manufactured goods and their marketability as per the relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demands, rejecting the appeals filed by the appellant. The judgment clarified that even though the moulds were sold as scrap after being worn out, they were still liable for excise duty due to their nature as manufactured goods and their marketability as per the relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>