<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 151 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that expenses on advertisement, gifts, and event sponsorship should not be added to the assessable value of goods. The appellant had already incurred these expenses, debited them in their accounts, and did not recover any part from buyers, making them part of the assessable value. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s argument unsustainable and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 151 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that expenses on advertisement, gifts, and event sponsorship should not be added to the assessable value of goods. The appellant had already incurred these expenses, debited them in their accounts, and did not recover any part from buyers, making them part of the assessable value. The Tribunal found the Revenue&#039;s argument unsustainable and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>