<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 141 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346083</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the reassessment orders dated 05.03.2004. It reiterated that once Form F declarations are accepted, they are conclusive unless reopened on specific grounds such as fraud or misrepresentation. The court found no such grounds in this case and emphasized the importance of adhering to the legal framework established by the Supreme Court in similar matters. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:05:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 141 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346083</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the reassessment orders dated 05.03.2004. It reiterated that once Form F declarations are accepted, they are conclusive unless reopened on specific grounds such as fraud or misrepresentation. The court found no such grounds in this case and emphasized the importance of adhering to the legal framework established by the Supreme Court in similar matters. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>