<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346078</link>
    <description>A conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be set aside where the parties file a joint compromise petition showing full and final settlement and no surviving dispute. On that basis, the High Court accepted compounding of the offence, held that the conviction and sentence imposed by the courts below could not stand, and set aside those judgments. The petitioner was acquitted following the settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:00:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 136 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346078</link>
      <description>A conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be set aside where the parties file a joint compromise petition showing full and final settlement and no surviving dispute. On that basis, the High Court accepted compounding of the offence, held that the conviction and sentence imposed by the courts below could not stand, and set aside those judgments. The petitioner was acquitted following the settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>