https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193536 The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and against the Department. It emphasized the importance of proper assessment procedures and avoiding double taxation concerns. The court held that relying on rejected books of account for additional additions beyond the estimation made by the Assessing Officer was inappropriate. The income added based on the rejected books of account was ordered to be deleted, supporting the appellant's position. en-us Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 07:00:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193536 The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant and against the Department. It emphasized the importance of proper assessment procedures and avoiding double taxation concerns. The court held that relying on rejected books of account for additional additions beyond the estimation made by the Assessing Officer was inappropriate. The income added based on the rejected books of account was ordered to be deleted, supporting the appellant's position. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193536