<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 608 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193525</link>
    <description>Res judicata may be applied even without a separately framed issue where the parties had notice of the plea, relied on the earlier litigation, and fully tried the material facts without showing prejudice; the prior adjudication therefore bound the appellants. Civil jurisdiction was not barred under the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973, because the Act bars only matters assigned to statutory authorities, while disputes over constitution of an educational agency and title to school properties remain within Civil Court competence. The appeal thus failed on both the procedural objection and the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=484230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 608 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193525</link>
      <description>Res judicata may be applied even without a separately framed issue where the parties had notice of the plea, relied on the earlier litigation, and fully tried the material facts without showing prejudice; the prior adjudication therefore bound the appellants. Civil jurisdiction was not barred under the Tamil Nadu Recognized Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973, because the Act bars only matters assigned to statutory authorities, while disputes over constitution of an educational agency and title to school properties remain within Civil Court competence. The appeal thus failed on both the procedural objection and the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>